Overall, the term most likely to be used by students in a consultation when defining a client’s bodyweight was your weight may be damaging your

health (67.6%) followed by you are an unhealthy weight (8.9%) ( Table 1). The majority of participants preferred to use a euphemism than the term obese or obesity (87.7% vs. 3.6%). There was no significant student group effect on preference for euphemisms. A minority of participants (8.5%) were unsure as to which term they would be most likely to use ( Table 1). Just under half the participants (48.8%) agreed or strongly agreed that a member of their profession should ‘always raise CT99021 ic50 the issue of a person’s obesity, even if the client is consulting about an unrelated health issue’. By contrast, 14.9% agreed or strongly agreed that that a member of their profession should ‘only discuss a person’s obesity if

the client raises the issue themselves’, and 34.9% agreed or strongly agreed that that a member of their profession should ‘only discuss a person’s obesity if s/he has first established that the client wishes to do so’. There were significant student group effects for each of the three statements (p < .001). Post hoc Chi-square analyses revealed that medical students were more likely to agree that a doctor should ‘always raise the issue’ and less likely to agree that doctor should ‘only discuss a person's obesity if s/he has first established that the client wishes to do so’, compared to all other student groups (p < .008). In addition, Nursing BSc students Erismodegib chemical structure more likely to agree that a nurse should ‘only discuss a person’s obesity if the client raises the issue themselves’, compared to medical students (p < .008) and dieticians (p = .009).

Just over half the participants felt confident or very confident Miconazole about discussing obesity with clients (n = 603, 58.2%). There was a significant student group effect (p < .01). Although trainee dieticians were more confident than all other student groups (p < .05), these differences were not significant using the Bonferroni corrected alpha of .008. The vast majority of participants felt that that more training on how to discuss obesity with clients would be either useful or essential (n = 985, 95.1%). Analysis of student group effect on training requirements was prevented by too few numbers in categories. The current study revealed that UK trainee HCPs’ preferred terms when raising the issue of obesity with clients were BMI, weight and unhealthy BMI which broadly reflects ratings of physicians and obese people in the US [22], [23] and [24]. The current findings are also similar to previous research in that participants’ least favored term was fatness [22], [23] and [24] whilst the term obesity was considered to be ‘neutral’ to ‘undesirable’ [22], [23] and [24]. Students, therefore, appear to appreciate that, although medically appropriate, the term obesity has come to have, for some, a negative social meaning by implying a sense of disgust [54].