A modification of the

PRECIS’ “wheel” plot, a visualization of the continuum in the 10 domains, is also presented, and the reader is encouraged to examine it. The rise of “pragmatism” Although the first article introducing the concept of pragmatism was published in 1967,5 the scientific community has only recently started to be aware of the issue. 6,12-14 Terms like pragmatic and its synonyms, practical and naturalistic, have been used at an increasing rate to express the need for more evidence that is applicable in routine clinical settings (the term naturalistic is also used to describe observational studies with Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical pragmatic aspects). Figure 2 illustrates this etymologic usage trend by plotting the appearance of the words pragmatic

Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical or naturalistic along with the word “trial” in articles indexed in MEDLINE. Although the search used to identify these articles is neither sensitive (not all pragmatic trials and articles on the subject are included) nor specific (the retrieved records might not be in fact pragmatic trials or discuss issues on the subject), there is a clear indication that the health sciences community is more sensitized to the whole pragmatism topic. Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical Also encouraging is the increasing rate of clinical trials (as defined by MEDLINE, again this is neither sensitive or specific) that use the words pragmatic and naturalistic in the title or the abstract, depicted in red in Figure 2. Figure 2. Articles per year catalogued in MEDLINE that have in the title or abstract the words pragmatic or naturalistic and the word trial. The red line represents the articles that are tagged from Medline as “Clinical Trial” or “Randomized … The majority of the scientific peer-reviewed

journals nowadays require registration of Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical clinical trials prior to their submission for publication. The ClinicalTrials.gov registry (www.ClinicalTrials.gov) is one of the most widely accepted, and follows an open-access philosophy. Interestingly, only a small Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical proportion (n=111) of the overall studies indexed in the registry (n=106 927 on May 5 2011) have used a term like pragmatic or naturalistic Entinostat to describe interventional studies (Figure 3A). An important observation is that 47 of these 111 trials are described as “Open” (still recruiting, ongoing, or not closed yet, Figure 3B), whereas the database selleck chem inhibitor includes 28 882 open interventional studies (Figure 3C). Another notable observation is that the distribution of the “pragmatic” trials seems to be reversed compared with the overall open ones: Europe is the region with the highest number of “pragmatic” trials, whereas the USA, first in the overall number of Bioactive compound ongoing trials, is in second place. Again, this is neither a sensitive nor a specific method to identify pragmatic trials; it serves as an indication and stimulus for the reader, rather than robust evidence. Figure 3. Interventional trials in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry. A.