2). Therefore the overall contribution of IgE directed against food components other than milk measured in this system was expected to be small. In order to further characterize the type of interactions observed

within this IgE analysis, principal component analysis (PCA) of the microarray data clustered MLN0128 molecular weight by product was carried out and is summarized in Fig. 3. Overall 84.4% of the variance could be explained by the first 2 principal components. With some interesting exceptions (patients #01, 02, 15 and 24) PCA data corroborated the data shown in Fig. 2 and the clinical diagnosis inclusion criteria with most of the patients showing indeed a spatial distribution heavily biased towards milk proteins (Fig. 3). Fluorouracil research buy The clustering of the different time points for the same patients was also noticeable, showing that even with the environmental challenges and time span of many years between sampling, the specific IgE signature of the individual patient is not as diverse as originally thought and remained relatively constant. Whilst consistent, the data shown in Fig. 3 have also shown that four patients did not conform to the IgE milk dominated signature.

Hence even within the relatively small number of patients selected and presented here, if used as a prognostic tool, the array profiling technique would have suggested that milk might not have been the main or only target of the treatment for all patients. As highlighted in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4, in more extreme cases such as patient #02 “shellfish” alone and not milk-specific IgE antibodies were the main sensitizing food component. The high incidence of specific IgE to fish and eggs in the Brazilian children population has been previously reported (Naspitz et al., 2004) but unfortunately shellfish allergens were not tested in this study. There is a remote possibility that the high shellfish reaction might be due to

cross-reactivity of e.g. highly conserved tropomyosin with ascarid nematodes, mites or cockroaches (Arruda and Santos, 2005). Patients such as #30 (Fig. 4) possessed low level of specific antibodies to milk however, in this particular case, coconut rather than cow’s milk would have been the major source Non-specific serine/threonine protein kinase of concern. This patient in particular possessed low milk ImmunoCAP results and positive SPT with atopic dermatitis symptoms when in contact with cow’s milk. Therefore whilst the absence of milk-specific IgE, as in the non-atopic controls, is still an inclusion criterion for the milk response group, higher specific IgE to other non-milk groups, as seen in patients #2, 15, and 24 clearly should have excluded these patients from the milk alone group and disturbed any mathematical modeling of the phenomenon. Within this cohort total cow’s milk ImmunoCAP results correlate strongly with Casein (R2 = 0.918) and α-lactalbumin ImmunoCAP (R2 = 0.