Kilgour

et al. (2004) compared seven indices with scores from three ordination axes. They found that the ordinations were more sensitive and concluded “we recommend that any suite of indices used for assessing benthic communities should include these types of multivariate metrics”. This nicely illustrates how ordination can be used to find the best linear additive model equivalent to an index, to produce a “pollution score” for a sample. Griffith et al. (2002) used both community metrics and a MV analysis to assess stream phytoplankton assemblages in mineral-rich streams, and found that the two approaches were sensitive to different environmental factors. Collier (2008) used eight metrics in a PCA (not a great idea we don’t think) to develop a “Multivariate Selleck UK-371804 Condition Score”, and compared it to Karr’s Index of Biotic Integrity. The Reference Condition

approach can be implemented either with an index/metric approach or a MV approach, or both. Finally, there are other approaches, new ones that do not fit into either the index/metric category or the MV analysis category. Warwick and Clarke, 1993, Warwick and Clarke, 1995 and Warwick and Clarke, 1998 and Clarke and Warwick, 1998a and Clarke and Warwick, 1998b have done pioneering work on new concepts related to community response to pollution stress such as taxonomic distinctness and structural redundancy. In summary, avoid using indices because of information loss and the likelihood that their

use will lead to misleading conclusions. If you absolutely must use indices for some non-scientific XL184 in vitro reason (hopefully not simply because your computer program calculates them!), use them together with other statistical methods that retain more of the information in the biological data set. Developing simplistic numbers simply to satisfy the least knowledgeable scientists and managers is hardly the best way to advance either scientific knowledge or management decision-making. “
“Since the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) was adopted in 2008, EU member states must develop activities to achieve “good environmental status” (GES) in the European marine environment by the year 2020 VAV2 (established in the Commission Decision 2010/477/EU of the 1st of September 2010). As well as many other tasks such as the conservation of biodiversity and the fight against oil pollution, the problem of marine litter, particularly plastics, has been recognized at the European level by a specific task group. Although monitoring programs of plastic pollution have long been implemented, and impacts on fish and seabirds have been reported, for example those induced by swallowing or entanglement in plastic items or ropes, more research is needed to support appropriate activities against other negative impacts of plastics on marine ecosystems. Adverse effects on marine organisms, particularly of microplastics (<5 mm) are investigated occasionally only.