In the context of this study, distributive justice refers LY2835219 mouse to

how risks, benefits and costs – be it social, economic or ecological – of marine finfish aquaculture activities are distributed among various actors. Recognition is associated with the question of whether different actors are considered and consulted as relevant stakeholders for any decision related to fish farms. Participative justice means to be able to participate effectively in decision-making process. This is not only restricted to having the right to participate or being consulted, but also whether there are well-established inclusive participatory mechanisms through which actors can make their voices heard. The capabilities aspect [11], [12] and [15] is linked to the extent to which aquaculture activities generate a risk (or support) to the integrity and proper functioning of individuals and coastal Buparlisib chemical structure communities. This embraces a range of basic needs, sustaining one׳s livelihood, culture and socioeconomic activities, and social, economic and political rights. Schlosberg׳s framework of environmental justice is

employed to elaborate this analysis for several reasons. First, this analytical framework has already been successfully applied to conflict studies related to other sectors such as forestry and mining [16] and [17]. Secondly, through a plural understanding of the concept, i.e. complementing the distributional aspect with recognition, participation and capabilities, it enables a comprehension of the wide range of demands selleck antibody encountered in these conflicts. Thirdly, this perspective emphasizes that theorizing from movement experience is suitable for studying conflicts since

such an approach brings theory and practice together. Fourthly, the framework emphasizes justice both at individual and community levels. This is very useful for the article׳s purposes since the analysis includes different groups within various communities, who did not only have claims for individual justice, but also for the social cohesion and broader functioning of their communities. Finally, this approach helps to structure the information in a way that enables considering the transformative policy aspiration in these conflicts. In this way, based on the data and the methodology explained in the next section and with the following results, the paper underlines their significance for policymaking and the aquaculture-related research agenda. Socio-environmental conflicts related to the use of nature and waste disposal have been widely studied [16], [18] and [19]. This body of literature includes studies on aquaculture-related conflicts from all over the world [9], [10], [20], [21], [22] and [23].