The above factors increased pressure on access and use of the Galapagos marine resources, and on demand for coastal space, as well as increasing the demand for raw material imported from the mainland, thereby increasing the risk of arrival of invasive species to the most pristine areas of Galapagos [20]. Increasing social conflicts and ecological degradation led to adoption of the Galapagos Special Law (GSL) and the Galapagos Marine Reserve Management Plan (GMRMP) in March 1998 and April 1999, respectively [21]. According to the GMRMP, the main management objective

is “protect and conserve the coastal and marine ecosystems of the archipelago and its biological diversity for the benefit of humanity, the local population, science and education” [17].

CAL-101 cost The Galapagos archipelago and its surrounding open ocean were designated as a multiple use marine reserve of nearly 138,000 km2 (Fig. 1) with an extension of its boundaries 40 miles offshore from the “baseline” (i.e., an imaginary line joining the outer islands of the archipelago). However, the most important measure was an institutional shift from a centralized top-down to a co-management approach, coupled with the prohibition of industrial fishing inside the GMR, allocation of exclusive use rights to local fishers, in the form of licenses and fishing permits, and adoption of a spatial EBM-oriented approach [14]. [The term EBSM is Selleckchem Navitoclax not used or explicitly defined in the GSL and GMRMP, but the general and specific management objectives and principles established buy Paclitaxel for management of the GMR [17] are compatible with the definitions provided by McLeod et al. [4] and Douvere and Ehler [10]. In addition, the GSL and the GMRMP provided the legal framework for the institutionalization of two nested decision-making bodies: the Participatory Management Board (PMB) and the Institutional Management Authority (IMA). Both decision-making bodies were used by local stakeholders and GNP’s authorities to initiate and institutionalize a consensus-based participatory process to zoning the GMR [21]. This spatially-explicit management tool facilitated the adoption

in practice, for the first time, of an EBSM approach. The GMR’s marine zoning planning phase was undertaken between June 1997 and April 2000. The specific aims were to reduce conflicting uses generated by human activities (e.g., tourism vs. fishing) that coexisted in the same geographical zones; to conserve and protect biodiversity; to ensure the sustainability of economic activities in the RMG; and to enforce the management principles and objectives set up in GSL and GMRMP [17]. The process involved can be subdivided in two main stages, based on the descriptions provided jointly by SPNG [17], Heylings et al. [15], and Edgar et al. [22]. The first stage involved institutionalization of a general zoning provision agreement (June 1997–April 1999).