Reasons for gastrostomy tube placement varied with age, from mental retardation and cerebral palsy in the younger age to CVA in older patients. Time from the replacement of the tube to initiation of symptoms varied widely from one day to one year. None of the published cases described this complication with a new inserted PEG. In all cases, Fludarabine purchase balloon GDC-0994 chemical structure feeding tube was used as a temporary solution in a well and established tract. Table 1 Characteristics of cases of feeding tube dislodgment pancreatitis Ref no. Age (y) Gender Type of catheter Diagnosis Time from replacement to presentation Replacement set-up

Repositioning confirmation test 10 37 m Foley Barium study 1 day NM None 11 11 m Foley Barium study 1 day Home None 12 32 f Foley Incidentally by ERCP 6 month Medical facility EGD 13 26 f Balloon gastrostomy w/external disk bumper CT 3 month NM NM 14 44 m Adriamycin clinical trial Foley ECRP NM NM NM 15 57 f Balloon gastrostomy w/external disk bumper MRCP 4 weeks NM NM 16 86 f Balloon gastrostomy w/external disk bumper CT 4 weeks Home None 17 25 f PEG w/ external disk bumper CT 3 days Home None 5 79 m Foley CT Few days Home None 5 38 f PEG w/ external disk bumper CT NM NM NM – 92 f Foley CT 1 year Home None NM- not mentioned, ERCP- endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography, EGD- esophago gastroduadenoscopy, CT- computed tomography, MRCP-

magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticograohy, PEG- percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. One case [12] describes the insertion setup to be in a medical facility and its position was confirmed using upper endoscopy. In all remaining cases the insertion setup was

not mentioned (5 cases) or was at the patient’s bedside (5 cases). In most instances (54.5%) no active test was done to confirm the new feeding tube position. Tube related complication is often managed by replacing the ADAM7 PEG with a Foley catheter as a bridging solution, in the acute setting at the emergency room or the patient’s bed side in nursing homes. In six of the reported cases (54.5%) Foley catheter was used and five (45.5%) reported the use of a balloon gastrostomy tube with external bolster. One of the major disadvantages of the Foley catheter at this non formal but common use is the lack of a stopper mechanism which prevents the catheter from propelling distally with peristalsis. Our case strengths the assumption made before [5] that the use of Foley catheter as a gastrostomy tube increases the risk of pancreatitis and should be avoided. Nevertheless in case of a Foley catheter is used as a bridging solution for a mechanically failed formal gastrostomy tube, early definitive proper elective replacement of the Foley catheter should be practiced in order to avoid potentially life threatening conditions. We strongly recommend replacing the failed or broken original feeding tube in a medical facility in order to confirm its position radiographically before using the tube.