Confidence intervals were determined with the Newcome-Wilson method at α = 0.05. Statistically significant features that had less than five sequences or low effect sizes (<0.5 difference between proportions or <1.0 ratio of proportions) were removed from the analysis. In addition, a two sided chi-square test, with Yates’ correction for continuity, was conducted, also using STAMP, on the level two subsystems. This test was done specifically to investigate if any level two EGTs in the N metabolism category were statistically different with a less conservative test [53]. Confidence intervals were calculated and effect size filters were used as with the Fisher exact tests. The multiple comparison

test correction used was the Benjamini-Hochberg eFT508 clinical trial FDR. Only biologically meaningful categories were included in the results https://www.selleckchem.com/products/CAL-101.html reported here (i.e., the miscellaneous category for subsystems was removed and, for the phylogenetic EGT matches, unclassified taxonomic groups were removed). Acknowledgements We thank Dr. Wendy M. Mahaney, Dr. Juan Carlos López-Gutiérrez, and Charlotte R. Hewins for help with collecting samples. Thank you also to Dr. Xiaodong Bai for his assistance with database creation and for running the local

BLASTN for us and to Dr. Laurel A. Kluber for advice on data analysis. This work was funded by the Holden Arboretum Trust and the Corning Institute for Education and Research. Electronic supplementary material Additional file 1: Tables S1-S4: Results from Fisher exact tests at all subsystem levels and a chi-square test conducted at level two using the Statistical Analysis of Metagenomic Profiles program. (DOC

114 KB) Additional file 2: Tables S5-S6: Nitrogen metabolism genes included in PAK5 the database created from the NCBI site and all matches from the +NO3- metagenome to nitrogen metabolism genes with a BLASTN. (DOC 308 KB) References 1. Vitousek PM, Aber JD, Howarth RW, Likens GE, Matson PA, Schindler DW, Schlesinger WH, Tilman DG: Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecol Appl 1997, 7:737–750. 2. Power JF, Schepers JS: Nitrate contamination of groundwater in north america. Agric Ecosyst Environ 1989, 26:165–187.CrossRef 3. Almasri MN, Kaluarachchi JJ: Assessment and management of long-term nitrate pollution of ground water in agriculture-dominated watersheds. J Hydrol 2004, 295:225–245.CrossRef 4. Owens LB, Edwards WM, Van Keuren RW: Peak nitrate-nitrogen values in surface runoff from fertilized pastures. J Environ Qual 1984, 13:310–312.CrossRef 5. King KW, Torbert HA: Nitrate and ammonium losses from surface-applied organic and inorganic fertilizers. J Agric Sci 2007, 145:385–393.CrossRef 6. Colburn EA: Vernal Pools: Natural History and Conservation. Blacksburg, VA: The McDonald & Woodward selleck products Publishing Company; 2004. 7. Carrino-Kyker SR, Swanson AK: Seasonal physicochemical characteristics of thirty northern Ohio temporary pools along gradients of GIS-delineated human land-use.