At the point of convergence, the maximum flow velocity is high, this website even far from the aperture. Furthermore, compared with the standard nozzle shown in Figure 1a, the velocity distribution on the workpiece surface is narrow, which enables a small stationary spot profile with a high removal rate in the case of long stand-off distances. To verify the effectiveness of the focusing flow, several fluid simulations were performed using a fluid simulation software (PHOENICS CHAM Co., London, England, UK). The simulation parameters are listed in Table 1.
In the case of a focusing-flow channel, the two streams meet after flowing from two apertures having a width of 500 μm and a thickness of 300 μm, as shown in Figure 1b. The angle selleckchem between the two streams is 90°. In contrast, the straight-flow nozzle has a rectangular aperture with a dimension of 1 mm × 300 μm. The three-dimensional velocity and pressure distributions are calculated for both nozzles. The k-ϵ model included in the software is employed to calculate the turbulent flow [11]. To quantitatively analyze the effect of the channel structure, the flow speed at both nozzle apertures is set to be the same. Figure 2 shows the simulation results for the straight-flow channel and focusing-flow channel. The velocity distributions on the XZ plane including the center line are shown in Figure 2a,b. The
velocity distributions on the plane, 1 μm from the workpiece surface, are compared in Figure 2c,d. Table 1 Fluid simulation parameters Parameters Model or values Turbulence model k-ϵ model Pressure 0.5 MPa Atmosphere Pure water at 20°C Density 998.23 kg/m3 Viscosity 1.006 × 10-3 Pa s EPZ004777 clinical trial Figure 2 Fluid simulation results showing the flow state of the jet. Flow from
the Endonuclease aperture to the workpiece surface in the case of a straight-flow nozzle and a focusing-flow nozzle. (a) Velocity distribution on XZ plane, straight-flow nozzle. (b) Velocity distribution on XZ plane, focusing-flow nozzle. (c) Velocity distribution on the plane, 1 μm from the workpiece surface, straight-flow nozzle. (d) Velocity distribution on the plane, 1 μm from the workpiece surface, focusing-flow nozzle. (e) Cross-sectional profile along A-A’ in (c). (f) Cross-sectional profile along B-B’ in (d). As the flow approaches the workpiece surface, it undergoes significant changes in its velocity direction as it rotates from perpendicular to nearly parallel to the wall. This leads to a flow with a high-shear rate on the workpiece surface even when the stand-off distance is 1 mm. The fluid pressure is increased on the surface where the two flows meet at the center. Then, the direction of the main stream changes toward the y-axis. From the viewpoint of machining, the velocity near the surface is an important evaluation factor. Figure 2e,f shows the cross-sectional profiles of the velocity distributions for the two types of nozzle.