2%) started TBPT. Among 3029 contacts aged >= 5 years, 93 (3.1%) started anti-tuberculosis treatment: 19 (20.4%) were smear-positive and 71 (76.3%) were culture-positive. Among contacts aged >= 14 years, 794/2133 (37.2%) underwent HIV testing, of whom 208/794 (26.2%) tested positive.
CONCLUSIONS: Household active case finding in this high TB and HIV prevalence setting
obtained high yields of TB, particularly in those aged <5 years, and facilitated assessment for TBPT. There was a good yield of new HIV diagnoses, and a gain in efficiency due to integration within one programme.”
“Objective: Appearance investment can be considered an important factor in the explanation of individual differences in adjustment to breast cancer. This study aims to analyze the role of this variable on a set of adjustment outcomes, namely, quality PD0325901 cost of life (QOL), emotional adjustment (depression and anxiety) and fear of negative evaluations. The differential role of motivational salience facet of appearance investment (MS; the individual’s efforts to be or feel attractive), conceptualized as a protective factor, and of self-evaluative salience facet (SES; the importance an individual places on physical appearance for their definition of self-worth), conceptualized as a vulnerability
factor, is explored.
Methods: This cross-sectional study included 117 Portuguese breast cancer patients (mean age = 52.47; SD = 8.81), on average 2.32 months (SD Fosbretabulin = 2.17) post-diagnosis. Appearance investment was measured by the ASI-R; QOL by the WHOQOL-bref; emotional adjustment by the HADS; and fear of negative evaluations by the FNE (Portuguese versions). Several hierarchical multiple regressions were conducted for each outcome, using investment facets as a predictor variable.
Results: Both facets of investment contributed find more to the explanation of social (p <= 0.001) and psychological (p <= 0.001) QOL and also depression (p <= 0.001), with SES being associated with poorer results and MS with better outcomes. SES also predicted higher levels of fear of negative
evaluations (p <= 0.001).
Conclusions: This study provided significant information about the role of appearance investment in the adjustment of breast cancer patients and added empirical support to SES-MS distinction. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.”
“OBJECTIVES: To evaluate excess mortality and risk factors for death during anti-tuberculosis treatment in Western Kenya.
METHODS: We abstracted surveillance data and compared mortality rates during anti-tuberculosis treatment with all-cause mortality from a health and demographic surveillance population to obtain standardised mortality ratios (SMRs). Risk factors for excess mortality were obtained using a relative survival model, and for death during treatment using a proportional hazards regression model.
RESULTS: The crude mortality rate during anti-tuberculosis treatment was 18.0 (95%CI 16.8-19.