, 2007). To ensure correct measurement of gene expression in drug-treated bacteria,

it is of the utmost importance to use appropriate controls. To address that issue, we conducted the present study to compare RNA and DNA as internal gene expression controls. A problem associated with using RNA as an internal control is that the relative expression of target mRNA may vary https://www.selleckchem.com/products/PD-98059.html extensively, depending on the control RNA that is used. In the current experiments, the use of different internal control RNAs led to diverse effects on target gene expression in C. pneumoniae (Fig. 2). Variation in the behavior of the internal control RNAs was determined by analyzing the stability of those molecules. The results of that assessment revealed marked differences in stability, with half-lives ranging from <5 min (rpoD) to 139 min (16S rRNA) (Fig. 3, Table 2). If transcription is blocked, for example by treatment with a compound such as INP0010 or exposure to an environmental signal, the level of the 16S rRNA will remain almost unaltered for more than an hour, whereas practically all rpoD transcripts will disappear PI3K Inhibitor Library in a shorter amount of time. Thus, relating target mRNA expression to such control mRNAs will yield different results, because the transcript stabilities will affect the relative

expression of any target mRNA differentially. We also found that the relative level of each control RNA varied between the phases in the developmental cycle, which yielded false results regarding relative target mRNA expression over time (Fig. 4). The relative amount of any given transcript can be related to the synthesis and decay of the target and control RNA: Hence, when using RNA as a control, the relative gene expression is

correlated with the expression of both the target and the control mRNA, as well PTK6 as with the degradation of the target and control transcripts (four independent parameters). Consequently, the observed increase or decrease in the relative expression of a certain gene can be due to several different factors and not necessarily altered transcription of that target gene. The complexity of using RNA as an internal gene expression control is illustrated by our results regarding rpoA. Although the relative amount of the rpoA transcript was reduced in the presence of INP0010 (Fig. 5), the stability of that transcript was slightly increased under these conditions (Fig. 3, Table 2). Moreover, the expression of rpoA in untreated cells increased >20-fold between 2 and 14 h p.i. (Fig. 4), which resulted in a reduced expression of any low-induced target mRNA that was temporally correlated with expression of rpoA. Consequently, due to their varied expression and stability, rpoA and other control RNAs are disqualified from being used as internal controls for measuring gene expression, at least in the early phase of the Chlamydia developmental cycle. Possibly, a more reliable control would be a combination of several control RNAs.