5°N) The C1-benzo(a)anthracenes/chrysenes, C2-phenanthrenes/anth

5°N). The C1-benzo(a)anthracenes/chrysenes, C2-phenanthrenes/anthracenes, and C4-phenanthrenes/anthracenes (n = 21 for all) all followed a similar spatial distribution to Total PAHs (n = 18). Concentrations averaged 1.968, 5.575, and 6.267 ppm, respectively ( Fig. 7; n = 21 in all cases). The C3-naphthalenes

were lower in concentration, averaging 180 ppb over the study area (n = 49), and its highest concentrations (2.540 ppm) were observed in close proximity to the spill site (−89°W, 29°N). Commercial species exhibited high average TPH values, averaging 3.968 ppt (n = 36; Fig. 8). The average concentration for Total PAHs (n = 32) was much lower at 129 ppb, ranging from bdl (0.0) to 2.643 ppm. Average concentrations of all other suites of compounds were very similar, ranging from 20 to 29 ppb ( Table 2). Peaks in TPH occurred to the east (−88.5°W, 29.5°N) and west (−91.0°W, 29.5°N) of the spill site, decreasing in all directions PF-562271 research buy from these points (Fig.

9). C1-benzo(a)anthracenes/chrysenes (n = 21) in this group averaged 22 ppb, while the selleck mean C2-phenanthrenes/anthracenes concentration was 26 ppb (n = 23). The average for C3-naphthalenes was very similar – 23 ppb (n = 21), as was that for C4-phenanthrenes/anthracenes (29 ppb; n = 21). The geographic distributions exhibited by these classes were similar to that of the C2-phenanthrenes/anthracenes, where peak concentrations were observed near Pensacola, FL. This study demonstrated that the spatial scale of the distribution of crude oil in four different media during and after the spill event, extended from western Florida to western Louisiana and to eastern Texas. Regarding the Texas signal, it is known whether the high

concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons in seawater and sediment, and in C-3 napthalenes in sediment, observed off Galveston were due the BP/DWH spill. Analysis of source biomarkers and n-alkane profiles of these samples have been performed. Although it is possible that the signals are derived from local historical Tacrolimus (FK506) spills such as occurred in 1984 (Alexander and Webb, 2005), 1990 (Kira et al., 1994), and 1999 (Etkin, 2001), the time between those spills and the sampling time would have allowed for significant degradation of the compounds in question. The connection detected between the spill site and Galveston as evidenced by analysis of seawater TPH concentrations, however, suggests that petroleum hydrocarbons from the spill may have reached this western site – ∼500 km from the spill source. This is possible since near-shore currents west of the Mississippi River, known to carry the Mississippi River plume to the west, represent a counter-flow operating in opposition to the easterly offshore boundary current at the edge of the continental shelf (Walker, 1996, Lugo-Fernandez et al., 2001 and Sturges and Lugo-Fernandez, 2005).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>