This way, the maintenance of the number of MDPC-23 cells and the discrete alterations in their morphology observed in present study demonstrate that in spite of presenting cytotoxic effects, ZOL did not cause direct cell death even at the

higher concentration (5 μM). Perhaps, the same ZOL concentrations evaluated in the present study (1 and 5 μM) could cause more intense cytopathic effects, if maintained for a longer time in contact with the odontoblast-like cell cultures, as described by Koch et al. 31 The effects of bisphosphonates on odontoblas-like cells could be related to the activation of different pathways, such as Mitogen-activated protein kinase Selleck Dasatinib (MAPK), Jun N- terminal kinase (JNK) as well as caspase pathways that regulate mitogenic activity, gene expression and apoptosis of cells.17 and 32 Epigenetic inhibitor libraries Further in vitro and in vivo studies are necessary to characterize the relationship between cytotoxicity and the concentration and

contact time of ZOL with blast cells. Based on the methodology used in the present in vitro study and the obtained results, it may be concluded that ZOL at concentrations of 1 μM and 5 μM presented a dose-dependent cytotoxic effects to the odontoblast-like cells MDPC-23 and decreased the expression of typical dentin matrix proteins, suggesting that under clinical conditions the release of this drug from dentin may cause damage to the pulp–dentin complex. Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), acetylcholine Grant # 2009/54722-1, BP DR 2009/52326-1.

The authors declare no conflict of interests. Not required. The authors acknowledge the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo-FAPESP (grants: 2009/54722-1 and BP.DR: 2009/52326-1) and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico and Tecnológico-CNPq (grant: 301291/2010-1) for the financial support. “
“The interaction between the malignant and surrounding cells in the tumoral microenvironment is an important step in the process of tumorigenesis. Malignant cells express growth factors in respective stages of tumour progression, which by autocrine and paracrine effects enable them to growth autonomously, escaping from immune surveillance.1 The myoepithelial cells exert important effects regulating the transition of an in situ to an invasive carcinoma, 2 since the myoepithelial cell layer act as a natural barrier. The disruption of both cell layers is an absolute prerequisite for breast tumour invasion. This cell has been associated with a tumour suppressor phenotype due to its ability to inhibit tumour growth by secretion of proteases inhibitors. 3 In addition, its immunomodulatory role in cancer behaviour has been emphasized in many studies. 2 and 4 There are two major hypotheses that explain the mechanism of tumour progression from in situ to stromal tumour invasion.