In consultation with WHO regional advisors on immunization, 15 co

In consultation with WHO regional advisors on immunization, 15 countries were selected

that together met the range of criteria. The IMs from each of the selected countries were contacted and briefed by staff from the WHO regional offices. Interviews were conducted in English, Modulators Spanish or French by two interviewers from WHO. The interviews were recorded and summarized by the interviewers. Interview transcriptions were sent back to the IMs for review, correction if necessary, and approval. A structured electronic data extraction form was developed with predefined data fields for extracting consistent data. For all interviews, data were extracted and entered by two independent researchers. A third independent senior researcher checked for accuracy and completeness of the two datasets. Data were analysed by question and mapped against matrix of determinants [6]. Interviews were completed with 13 IMs from the six WHO regions: one from AMR (Panama), two from AFR (Republic Dasatinib supplier of the Congo, Zimbabwe), two from EMR (Saudi buy MK-2206 Arabia, Yemen), three from EUR (Armenia, Belgium, Montenegro, one from SEAR (India), and four from WPR (Japan, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Philippines); most represented low and middle income countries (n = 11). Interviews lasted on average 30 min. Four IMs explicitly defined their understanding of vaccine hesitancy, as follows: (i) those persons resisting to get vaccinated due to various reasons (Country K); (ii) someone

who does not believe vaccines are working and are effective and that vaccines are not necessary (Country F); (iii) parents who would not allow immunization of their child and policy makers who hesitate to introduce a vaccine especially in regard to new vaccinesvs other existing public health interventions (Country L);

(iv) an issue that should be addressed when reaching 90% vaccination coverage (Country C). Although the views of other IMs regarding vaccine hesitancy were less explicit, most associated vaccine hesitancy with parental refusal of one or more vaccines (n = 9). Vaccination delays were not included in the definition of of vaccine hesitancy by IMs, except in one country, where the IM stated: There is not a problem with under-vaccinated or unimmunized. There are issues with timely vaccination—with following the schedule. Parents are delaying the vaccinations (Country F). Table 1 summarizes the opinions of the IMs regarding vaccine hesitancy in their countries. At the time of the interview, all except one IM had heard reports of people reluctant to accept one or all vaccines in their country (Table 2). In the country where no such reports had been heard, the problem reported was vaccine refusal for reasons related to religious beliefs, not hesitancy. In another country, the IM had not heard of any reports of vaccine hesitancy, but acknowledged that a small proportion of the whole population had some concerns regarding vaccine safety and could be considered as vaccine-hesitant.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>