On the Schäfer nomogram, six of nine Group 1 cases had obstructions less than IV and normal or weak detrusor contractility. For Group 2, six of eight cases had obstructions more than IV and normal or strong detrusor contractility. Conclusion: Patients with higher levels of alpha-1D AR mRNA were distinct from those with higher alpha-1A AR mRNA levels with regard to obstruction and detrusor activity. The results suggest that the Schäfer

nomogram might be useful in determining which alpha-1 AR antagonists are better for BPO Luminespib mw patients suffering from storage symptoms. “
“Objectives:α1-blockers have commonly been used as first-line medical therapy for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Recently, a highly selective α1A-adrenoceptor antagonist, silodosin, was developed in Japan. We examined the efficacy and safety of conversion from conventional α1-blockers to silodosin in men with BPH. Methods: Conversion to

silodosin was proposed to consecutive patients on conventional α1-blockers for symptomatic BPH for at least 6 months. The effects of conversion were examined by the International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life index, overactive bladder symptom score, peak flow rate, residual urine volume, and adverse STI571 ic50 events at 12 weeks. The efficacy of silodosin was also evaluated by patients’ impression. Results: Eighty-one men underwent conversion, for the most part because of dissatisfaction with the efficacy of their current treatment in improving nocturia or weak stream. The International Prostate Symptom Score total score significantly improved from 12.7 ± 5.9 at baseline to 10.6 ± 5.4 at 4 weeks (P < 0.001) and 10.9 ± 5.8 at 12 weeks (P < 0.01). The progress was mostly due

to improvement in voiding symptoms, although reduction of storage symptoms was also significant. The quality of life index also significantly Carbohydrate decreased with conversion to silodosin. Efficacy as judged by patients’ impression was 76% (37/49) at 12 weeks of treatment. None of the overactive bladder symptom score, peak flow rate, and residual urine volume exhibited significant change. No serious adverse events were observed during the study period. Conclusion: Conversion to silodosin may be beneficial in men who are dissatisfied with conventional α1-blockers for BPH, and be particularly useful in improving voiding symptoms. “
“Objectives: To estimate correlations among lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), bother, and quality of life (QOL) and assess fluctuations in these parameters after α1-blocker administration in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods: Untreated BPH patients with international prostate symptom scores (IPSS) ≥ 8 and IPSS-QOL scores ≥ 2 were administered tamsulosin at 0.2 mg/day for 4 weeks in a prospective multicenter study. We subsequently estimated the IPSS, bother score for each IPSS item, BPH impact index (BII), and IPSS-QOL score before and 4 weeks after tamsulosin administration.