One reason proposed for this is that a ‘one size fits all’ approach CH5424802 manufacturer has been used, and this is sub-optimal as it ignores the well-documented heterogeneity of WAD.67, 68, 69 and 70 There are now many data demonstrating that other factors shown to be present in acute WAD and associated with poor recovery may need to be considered in the early management of the condition. In particular, these include the sensory presentation of WAD, which allows some understanding of nociceptive processes involved, and psychological factors that may impede recovery. A recent high-quality randomised trial investigated if the early targeting of these factors would provide better outcomes than usual care. Participants

with acute WAD (≤4 weeks duration) were assessed

using measures of PLX3397 pain, disability, sensory function and psychological factors, including general distress and post-traumatic stress symptoms. Treatment was tailored to the findings of this baseline assessment and could range from a multimodal physiotherapy approach of advice, exercise and manual therapy for those with few signs of central hyperexcitability and psychological distress to an interdisciplinary intervention comprising medication (if pain levels were greater than moderate and signs of central hyperexcitability were present) and cognitive behavioural therapy delivered by a clinical psychologist (if scores on psychological questionnaires were above threshold). This pragmatic intervention approach was compared to usual care where the patient could pursue treatment as they normally would. Analysis revealed no significant differences in frequency of recovery (defined as Neck Disability Index <8%) between pragmatic and usual-care groups at 6 months (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.29) or 12 months (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.47). There was no improvement in non-recovery rates at 6 months (64% for pragmatic care and 49% for usual care), indicating no advantage of the early interdisciplinary intervention.71 Several possible reasons for these results were proposed. The

design of the trial may have been too broad and not sensitive enough to detect changes in sub-groups of patients, suggesting better outcomes would be achieved by specifically ADP ribosylation factor selecting patients at high risk of poor recovery. With a clinical prediction rule now developed for WAD30 and undergoing validation, this approach can be evaluated in future trials. Additionally, 61% of participants in the trial found the medication (low-dose opioids and/or adjuvant agents) to be unacceptable due to side effects such as dizziness and drowsiness, and did not comply with the prescribed dose,71 indicating that more acceptable medications need to be evaluated. Compliance with attending sessions with the clinical psychologist was less than compliance with physiotherapy, perhaps indicating patient preference for physiotherapy.