Ribavirin reduced MDA in hepatic vein No significant changes wer

Ribavirin reduced MDA in hepatic vein. No significant changes were observed in any of these parameters in colchicine-treated patients. No patient was withdrawal because of adverse effects in any group, although ribavirin dose was reduced in one patient because of anemia. Conclusion: Maintenance Maraviroc cost treatment with ribavirin ameliorates portal hypertension in patients with HCV cirrhosis. Further studies should explore the long-term benefit of ribavirin in patients awaiting for effective new antiviral therapies Ribavirin Colchicin

*p<0.05 vs. baseline Disclosures The following people have nothing to, disclose: Agustin Albillos, Beatmiz Peñas, Juan de la Revilla, Margaret Lario, Óscar Pastor, Cristina Martin, Belen RuizAntoman, Jose Luis Calleja Background: Nonselective betablockers are a cornerstone of prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in patients with portal hypertension. Carvedilol seems to have superior hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) response rates compared to propranolol

or nadolol, however increasing doses may lead to further hepatic decompensation mainly attributed to decreases in systemic blood pressure. Methods: Patients within an HVPG guided primary or secondary prophylaxis program to prevent variceal bleeding with carvedilol were treated and tested with increasing doses of carvedilol up to 50 PI3K inhibitor mg, if the lowest given dose failed to show response (decrease of HVPG >=20%) Results: In 41 patients MCE公司 carvedilol was used for primary prophylaxis. While 7/31 (23%) patients responded to 6,25mg carvedilol, 5 out of 7 (71%) responded to 12, 5mg, but interestingly 0 out of 3 in whom 25mg was chosen as first dose. When doubling the

dose 6 of 13 (46%) patients responded to 12, 5mg instead of 6,25mg, none of 3 responded to 25mg instead of 12,5mg and 1 responded to 50mg instead of 25mg.18/38 (47%) responded to 12,5mg carvedilol in an ITT analysis, 13/20 (65%) per protocol in primary prophylaxis.17 patients received carvedilol for secondary prophylaxis.5 of 12 responded to 12,5mg (42%), after doubling the dose to 25mg none of 2 responded.3 of 5 (60%) with 25mg as initial dose responded.8/17 (47%) responded to 25mg of carvedilol in an ITT analysis and per protocol. Conclusion: 12,5mg carvedilol seems to be an effective dose in primary prophylaxis, while in secondary prophylaxis 25mg carvedilol should be targeted to prevent variceal bleeding.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>