Table 2 U266 cells express opioid and somatostatin binding sites. [Diprenorphine] (nM) CPM [Somatostatin] (nM) CPM 0,5
44 ± 32 0,025 139 ± 66 1 127 ± 84 0,05 506 ± 313 2,5 157 ± 90 0,076 628 ± 92 5 197 ± 78 0,1 677 ± 326 10 552 ± 276 0,25 987 ± 483 20 2746 ± 1382 0,5 2464 ± 869 Crude membrane fraction was incubated with [125I-Tyr0] somatostatin www.selleckchem.com/products/Temsirolimus.html or [3H]diprenorphine as described in materials and methods. Data represent mean ± S.E.M. (n = 3–4) of specific binding expressed in CPM. Figure 1 Expression of SSTRs and opioid receptors in malignant haematological cell lines. A-F, RNAs were extracted from various hemopathy cell lines, reverse transcribed, and cDNAs encoding for SSTR1 to 5 were amplified by PCR. PCR products were separated on agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. St : 100 pb ladder, 1 : Jurkat, 2 : Nalm6, 3 : RPMI-8226, 4 : Ramos, 5 : MCF-7, 6 : NCI-H929, 7 : LP-1, 8 : SH-SY5Y, 9 : 697, 10 : U266, C : negative control. * corresponds to the band of the expected size. G, opioid receptors (KOP-, DOP- and MOP-R) were amplified by PCR. St : 100 pb ladder, 1 : U266, 2 : SH-SY5Y, C : negative control. H, expression of opioid receptors (KOP-, DOP- and MOP-R) was studied by western-blot Roscovitine in U266 cells (lane 1) and in positive controls (lane 2): human placenta (KOP-R), SH-SY5Y (MOP-R) and SK-N-BE
cells (DOP-R). Data are representative of three independent experiments. Thus, the U266 cell line represents a suitable model for exploring putative interactions between somatostatin and opioid receptors to modulate cellular proliferation and apoptosis [29–33]. Effect of SSTR and opioid agonists on U266 cell viability Cell viability was then evaluated using IMP dehydrogenase XTT selleck compound assays. All experiments were done in culture medium containing FCS. U266 cells were treated or not (control) in the presence of either Sst or Oct, a SSTR2, 3 and 5 selective agonist [6, 34], ranging from 100 pM to 10 μM during 24, 48 or 72 h. As depicted on the Figure 2A,
Sst, even at high concentrations, was devoid of any significant effect on cell viability at 24, 48 or 72 h pretreatment. When cells were exposed to a selective SSTR antagonist, cyclosomatostatin (Css), alone or in combination with Sst, no significant effect was detected. Stimulation of SSTR2, 3 and 5 by Oct (100 pM to 10 μM) alone or in combination with 10 μM of Css for 24, 48 or 72 h was unable to promote any significant modification of cell viability (Figure 2B). Figure 2 Effect of Sst, Oct and Morph on U266 cell line viability. Exponentially growing cells were seeded and incubated for 24, 48 or 72 h with (A) somatostatin (Sst), (B) octreotide (Oct), (C) Sst alone or combined with 10 μM morphine (Morph). The SSTR antagonist cyclosomatostatin (Css) was also included. U266 cell viability was determined using the XTT assay and data were normalized to absorbance values obtained in control cells. Data are mean ± S.E.