The center column between the experimental density plots of JC and JOC indicates the average value of conductance obtained from the simulations for each geometry (double contact, monomer and dimer). The thickness of the rectangles around each geometry indicates the standard deviation. It is clear from this plot that the top high frequency events in the density plots corresponds
to a double contact and the check details bottom high frequency events corresponds to monomer and dimer configurations. Although, as we mentioned, it is difficult to distinguish the monomer and dimer using our theoretical model, we can see that the average of conductance of monomers is above the one of the dimers. If we add to this that we would expect a higher tunnel conductance (on average) prior to the formation of a monomer, we can label maxima 1 and 2 as dimer and monomer, respectively. Figure 4 JC and JOC density plots together with conductance calculations of different geometries of the contact. Inside
the experimental density plots, we have marked the average conductance values after or before the jump as obtained from DFT electronic transport calculations with their deviations. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/Cyt387.html Conclusions Experiments of JC and JOC show that certain structures are more likely to occur than others. This depends on the metal and on the process of breaking/formation and the type of structure Phospholipase D1 at the electrodes. Simulations and calculations (MD and DFT) of these experiments show that three basic atomic structures are formed at the contact: monomers, dimers and double contacts. We have identified within the double contact structure several different atomic arrangements that we named double dimeric contact (parallel and perpendicular), and double Epigenetics inhibitor monomeric contact. According to DFT electronic transport calculations, double contacts have an average value of conductance of 1.73G 0, which correlates very well with one of the peaks observed experimentally both for JC and for JOC. This configuration is also obtained in JC and JOC from the MD simulations and, for some very stable
tips, is the dominant configuration. Monomers and dimers, however, are difficult to distinguish from the simulations since their average conductance values are very similar (0.97G 0 and 0.92G 0, respectively). In the case of JOC, these two peaks cannot be resolved. Interestingly, the conductance values are somehow lower than in the case of JC, which could indicate the most likely formation of stretched contacts. Acknowledgements This work was supported by the Spanish government through grants FIS2010-21883, CONSOLIDER CSD2007-0010, Generalitat Valenciana through PROMETEO/2012/011, ACOMP/2012/127 and Feder funds from E.U. References 1. Agraït N, Levy-Yeyati A, van Ruitenbeek JM: Quantum properties of atomic-sized conductors. Phys Rep 2003, 377:81.CrossRef 2.